澳洲代写大学论文：民族主义
在基本的假设,即民族主义是现代性的产物,同时从同一是分不开的,大多数集中在民族主义的理论。因此,它已经被人民认为,民族主义被认为是间接或直接的结果产业化及其新的分工。同时,这也是很多人相信从文化和国家之间的婚姻,民族主义是现代性的后代,在坛上,民族主义是庆祝(Ozkirimli 2010)。现代性这一事实被认为与民族主义的概念也被汤姆奈恩。还有许多其他作者像沃克康纳,大卫·艾里。迈克尔·赫克托和埃里克Hobsbawn认为民族主义是局限于现代国家的崛起。
必须指出现代性是民族主义的最重要的组件,它已经非常有影响力的现代意识形态在不同的现代性的主要思想或流程。即使没有约定或足够的民族主义和国家的定义。许多历史学家根据史密斯和哈钦森同意作为话语和意识形态,是在西欧和北美民族主义成为流行的18世纪的下半叶。然而,为了理解ethno-symbolism的概念的“竞争对手”,安东尼·d·史密斯采取了严格的现代主义一词的使用。
澳洲代写大学论文：民族主义
It is on the basic assumption that nationalism is a product of modernity and the same time is inseparable from the same that most of the theories of nationalism are centered on. Hence, it has been argued by Ernest Gellner that nationalism is regarded as the indirect or direct result of the industrialization together with its fresh division of labor. At the same time, it is also believed by many that from the marriage between culture and state, nationalism is the offspring and it was on the altar of modernity that nationalism was celebrated(Ozkirimli 2010). The fact that modernity is regarded inseparable from the concept of nationalism is also described by Tom Nairn. There are many other authors like Walker Connor, David Laitin, Michael Hechter and Eric Hobsbawn who are of the opinion that nationalism is confined to the rise of the modern state.
It must be noted that the most crucial component of modernity is nationalism and it has been very much influential as a modern ideology in various key ideas or processes of modernity. Even though, there are not very agreed upon or adequate definitions of nationalism and nations. Many historians according to Smith and Hutchinson agree on the fact that as a discourse and ideology, it was in Western Europe and North America that nationalism became prevalent in the latter half of the 18th century. However, in order to understand the concept of ethno-symbolism’s ‘rivals’, Anthony D. Smith has adopted a restrictive use of the term modernism.
