澳洲公共关系论文代写：国际关系
国际关系一直是从现实主义的角度分析许多学者，如亚历山大·汉密尔顿，无论事实的基础IR起源于欧洲地区。现实主义作为一种模式已经从过去六年由于模型所提供的研究在远东和欧洲系列侵略面对第一次世界大战后的国际秩序崩溃的建筑结构导致IR，二战和冷战[摩根索，H. J.（1973）。国家间政治：权力与和平的斗争）。古典现实主义更多地集中在悲观人性论上，无论是神学版本还是世俗版本[布朗，C（2012）。“实践转向，实践智慧和古典现实主义]。利己主义和自我利益的行为问题不仅是某些领导发现，但是是一个基本的人类政治的问题，使得现实主义理论的一部分。[约根森，J.（2010） 国际关系理论]
制度主义
制度主义理论是由相同的假设在现实主义理论。这些假设表明，国际制度：a）没有组织，B）States有一个态度，更喜欢自己的利益，C）理性的演员只存在，以提高他们的物质条件，D）之间的关系国家的特点是不确定性[屠宰，上午（2011）。国际关系，主要理论。然而，制度的结论不同，说明在国际体系中的国家之间的合作是可能的。这一结论来源于微观经济理论和博弈论。
自由主义
与上述两种理论不同的是，自由主义的理论更为复杂，作为一种理论。这一理论的基本思想是：由于国际关系的存在，各国的国家特点都在研究。这是一个现实主义和制度主义户口所在州有一定的目的和态度即自利行为寻求财富在国际体系中的[克莱斯勒生存期间的矛盾，标准差（1983），国际制度。]。
澳洲公共关系论文代写：国际关系
Interpretive Approach to International Relations: Strengths and Weaknesses
International Relations have been always been analyzed from a realist perspective by many scholars like Alexander Hamilton, regardless of the fact that the foundation of IR originates from the European region. Realism as a model has been leading the IR since the last six decades due to the constructive structure provided by the model to study the collapse of the post-World War I international order in the face of serial aggressions in the Far East and Europe, World War II, and the Cold War[ Morgenthau, H. J. (1973). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace]. The classical realism has been more focused on the pessimistic theory of human nature, either a theological version or a secular version[ Brown, C. (2012). ‘The Practice Turn, Phronesis and Classical Realism’]. The issue of egoism and behaviour of self interest have not only been found in certain leaders, but is a basic issue to homo politics that makes it a part of realist theory.[ Jorgensen, J.K. (2010) International Relations Theory]
Institutionalism
The theory of Institutionalism is comprised of the same assumptions as in the Realism theory. These assumptions stated that international system: a) is not organized, b) the States have an attitude of preferring self interest, c) rational actors only exist to enhance their material condition, d) relation between countries in characterized by uncertainty[ Slaughter, A.M. (2011). International Relations, Principal Theories]. However, the conclusion of Institutionalism is different stating that cooperation between countries in the international system is possible. This conclusion is derived from the use of microeconomic theory and game theory.
Liberalism
Unlike the above two theories, the theory of liberalism is more complex and less organized as a theory. The primary idea of this theory is that the national characteristics of every State are studied because of the presence of international relations. This is a contradiction to the Realist and Institutionalism accounts where the States have necessarily the same aim and attitude i.e. self-interest behaviour seeking for wealth during survival in the international system[ Krasner, S.D.(1983), International Regimes.].
