澳洲代写:虚假或具误导性的广告

| 2-6月-2020 | 澳洲代写

今天为大家整理一篇优秀的essay范文-澳洲代写:虚假或具误导性的广告。本文讲述的是在广告中,据说人们被给予折扣,第一周是免费的。这不是真的。所有的人都被收取相同的价格,这个广告活动本身是不真实的。这直接违反了第29(1)(i)条。被发现从事这种违反行为的公司或企业被发现承担民事损害责任。S151规定,人们也容易受到犯罪行为的影响,直接受到影响的人可以提起民事诉讼,要求赔偿损失。如需要完整内容的澳洲代写范文资料,请联系我们的客服。

澳洲代写:虚假或具误导性的陈述

ACL第29条禁止提供和推广商品和服务的信息。第29(1)(a)条规定,人们不应就货物的标准提供任何误导性的陈述。第29(1)(b)条规定,标准质量、等级或服务不得伪造。据指出,医药产品认证协会已经认可了该公司开发的增刊。这是为了提高产品的服务等级,当它不是真的。澳洲代写关于本机构批准的误导性陈述直接违反了第29(1)(g)条。在同一页中,有一份免责声明声明其不真实。第29(1)(e)条明确规定不应有关于产品或服务的虚假证明,第29(1)(f)条规定不应有关于服务的虚假证明。很明显,琳达提供了虚假证词,这是明确禁止的。

澳大利亚竞争与消费者委员会诉Coles超市澳大利亚Pty有限公司[2014]FCA 634。在这种情况下,在Coles中烘焙的产品作为在国内从零开始烘焙的产品销售。事实上,一些面包产品是从海外国家进口的。澳洲代写法院裁定有违反第18、29 (1)(a)和第33条的情事。该法第33节论述了在产品目的的性质、特征和适用性等方面易误导公众的行为责任。该公司受到了处罚。调查发现,该公司违反了ACL的3个部分。

类似于BLT公司已经被发现创建一个广告活动,澳洲代写其中的人被发现已经创建了一些问题。

False or misleading representations

Section 29 of the ACL prohibits the information about the supply and promotion of the goods and services. S 29(1) (a) states that people should not provide any misleading representation about the standard of the goods. S 29(1) (b) states that there should be no falsification of the standard quality or grade or services. It has been stated that the Pharmaceutical Products Accreditation Association has endorsed the supplement developed by the company. This is to improve the service grade of the product when it is not true. This misleading representation about the approval from this agency is in direct violation of s 29(1) (g). 澳洲代写In the same page, there is a disclaimer stating that it is not true. S 29(1) (e) clearly states that there should not be false testimonials about the product or the services and s 29(1)(f) states that there should be no false testimonials about the services. It is quite evident that Linda had provided false testimony and this is explicitly prohibited.

In the advertisement, 澳洲代写it has been said that people are given discounts and the first week is free. It is not true. All the people are charged the same price and this advertisement campaign in itself is not true. This is in direct violation of s 29(1)(i). The companies or business found to be engaged in such breach conduct are found to be either liable to civil damage. S151 states that people are also susceptible for criminal action and the person who has been affected directly can file a civil case to recover their damages.

相关的论文代写的话题