本篇澳洲 essay 代 写-好撒玛利亚人的新麻烦讲了必须通过好撒玛利亚人法，并对法律漏洞进行更多讨论，通过这些漏洞，撒玛利亚人可以在帮助他人时陷入困境。如果这是创造一个富有同情心的社会的唯一途径，那么法律应该承认撒玛利亚人的重要性。本篇澳洲 essay 代 写文章由澳洲第一论文 Assignment First辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
The purpose of this work is to carry out both a review and a critical analysis as part of the review. In the first part of the review, a summary understanding of the article was presented. The second part reviews the article critically with supporting and dissenting evidence from other scholarly articles. The article attempts to present a new dilemma in context with the Samaritan actions. A Samaritan is someone who aids a person in distress. China lacks Good Samaritan laws and does not have the effective legal elements necessary to protect the Good Samaritan from extorted by the victim. This hence leads to a paradigm of problems. The author argues that social trust, compassion and the principle of reciprocity are lost because of extortion used on the good Samaritans.
Yan (2009) argued that it becomes easier for people to not assist a stranger in distress. They walk away from the stranger in distress, because they do not want to become part of an extortion scheme. On a larger magnitude, it creates a society that has no trust or compassion for one another.
Yan (2009)’s argument is supported in other research works, too. Bu (2017) believes that apathy is fast entering Chinese mainstream society. Apathy is defined as the lack of concern. A society that has a high degree of apathy will not care or have concern about others. In the moral realm, this is a perilous development for society. According to Bu (2017) apathy has developed in the Chinese society as people who would generally step in to assist a stranger are stopped in their actions because of fear of liabilities and extortion activities. Imposing a legal duty would not improve the situation, but having some form of Samaritan law to protect the Samaritan who will be beneficial in such situations.
The long awaited Good Samaritan law finally was passed in Shanghai in the year 2016. It was passed to ensure that when a citizen without first aid steps in to assist someone by carrying out calls to emergency services and doing first aid with guidance, they would be protected even if something goes wrong (Linder, 2016). Now this Samaritan law is not broad in its interpretation and will not account for such situations like that of what Yan (2009) presented, but it is indeed a first when it comes to recognizing the legal protection that is needed for the Good Samaritan.
Conclusion
Good Samaritan laws have to be passed with more discussion on the legal loopholes through which Samaritans could land in trouble when they are assisting someone out. If that is the only way to create a compassionate society, then the law should indeed recognize the Samaritan’s importance.
对于澳洲论文代写如何选择先给大家介绍到这里，如果您有代写价格需要我们帮助的请联系我们网站客服，我们会24小时在线为您服务。
