澳洲堪培拉论文代写：北方劳动力市场
北方劳动力市场的困难已经发生。与此同时，南方对外直接投资的投资大幅增加，而南方对北方的制成品出口也是如此。与南方的工业贸易没有普遍的危害;它可能会使发达国家受益。但是，也不确定今后是否会受到伤害。在评估劳动标准变化的过程中使用了各种指标（Elliott and Freeman 2003）。这些因素包括实际工资和国家的增长率，以及结构变化指标，健康状况，安全措施和工会组织安全等因素。 Ghosh在2003年提出，劳动标准是从工人薪酬的非工资部分中适当衡量的。实际工资增长被认为是相同的替代品。
过去20多年来，全球化经济的全球化和自由化与黄金时代相比，经济发展的新模式已经引起了许多学者和研究者的争论。它的特点是在每个市场上都有激烈的竞争和市场权威（Slaughter and Swagel，1997）。在北方近二十年的时间里，这个模型现在和南方都在工作，并且已经工作了十年。在经济福利方面，撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲的劳工或北方的劳动者的总体结果并不理想。由于亚洲国家尤其是印度和中国的政府与拉美国家相比，并没有完全开放资本账户体制或贸易体制，因此更为成功。亚洲各国政府也努力支持这些机构及其各自的积累制度。
澳洲堪培拉论文代写：北方劳动力市场
The difficulties in the labor market have taken place in the North. This was at the same time when there was an enormous rise in the investment in FDI in south and when there was South’s manufactured exports to the North. There is no general harm because of the industrial trade with the South; it might have resulted in benefiting developed nations though. However, it is not sure whether it won’t harm in future too. A variety of indicators are used in the process of assessment of changes in the labor standards (Elliott and Freeman 2003). These factors include growth rate of the real wages and also of the nation, among other variables the structural change’s indicators, health, measures of security and unionization and safety. It was argued by Ghosh in 2003 that standards of the labor are properly measured from the workers’ remuneration’s non-wage component. Real wages growth is regarded as a decent substitute for the same.
It has been argued by many scholars and researchers in the past that globalization and liberalization of global economy in the past 20 years shows a fresh model for the development of economy when compared with the Golden Age. It is by intensified competition and market authority in every market that it is characterized (Slaughter and Swagel 1997). For almost two decades in the North the model has been working now and in south as well it has been working for a decade. In economic well-being terms, its overall results have not been good both for workers in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America or labor in the North. As the governments in Asian nations especially India and China didn’t liberalize either the capital-account regimes or trade regimes fully as compared to the Latin American nations, thus they have been more successful. The Asian governments also have made an effort to support the institutions and their respective accumulation regimes which support them.