澳洲拉托贝大学论文代写：领导者类型
任何渴望执行的组织都需要一个好的领导者，他能指导团队并制定与组织目标一致的目标。因此，那些处于领导地位或具有领导才能的人具有巨大的讨价还价能力。所有的组织都需要人的动机和准备去额外英里（切默斯达到规定的目标，2014）。领导受雇于同一工作。他们保持团队的积极性，帮助公司向前跃进。优秀的领导者有能力造就优秀的员工。
澳洲拉托贝大学论文代写：领导者类型
民主党领导人
顾名思义，这些类型的领导者在做出任何决定之前都会咨询整个团队。允许团队成员提供他们的投入。这一决策领导关心团队成员的意见和决定是符合每个团队成员个人发表的意见（Schein，2010）。然而，这种决策领导有时是无效的，当团队成员有完全不同的观点时。在这种情况下，就很难让经理照顾整个表达的意见（Dinhet al，2014）。他需要缩小对大多数团队成员都能接受的特定决定。
放任型领导者
当一个领导者有一个非常有能力和智力的团队，那么团队成员就可以自行决定。在这种情况下，领导者不干预的决策团队（诺思豪斯，2014）。这种决策领导力的缺点是，有时团队可能会失败，因为领导者并没有密切监视团队。团队可能高度分心，可能偏离设定的路径。
澳洲拉托贝大学论文代写：领导者类型
Any organization aspiring to perform always needs a good leader who can mentor the team and set goals which are in line with organizational goals. Hence, individuals who are at leadership positions or if they have the leadership qualities have huge bargaining powers. All organizations need people who are motivated and are ready to go that extra mile to achieve the prescribed goals (Chemers, 2014). The leaders are hired for the same job. They keep their team motivated and help the company to take a leap forward. Good leaders are capable of making good employees.
澳洲拉托贝大学论文代写：领导者类型
Democratic Leaders
As the name suggests, these types of leaders consult the complete team before making any decision. The team members are allowed to give their inputs. This decision making leadership takes care of the views of the team members and the decision taken is in line with the views expressed by each team member individually (Schein, 2010). However, this kind of decision making leadership is ineffective sometimes when the team members have entirely different perspectives. In such cases, it becomes difficult for the manager to take care of the entire opinions expressed (Dinhet al, 2014). He needs to narrow down on a particular decision which would be acceptable to the most of the team members.
Laissez-Faire Leaders
When a leader has a very capable and intellectual team, then the team members are allowed to take their own decisions. In this case, the leader does not interfere in the decision making by the team (Northouse, 2014). The drawback in this kind of decision making leadership is that sometimes, the team might fail because the leader is not monitoring the team closely. The team might be highly distracted and might derail from the set path.