In the reading Research in Art and design, it deals with the stereotypes that are involved in the facet of research. It has been found that it outlines differential aspects that have been connected with the research paradigm. For this, Frayling had adopted a structured approach in analysing the nuances of the research in Art and design. He has elucidated a lot of examples to explain about the situation. From the analysis Frayliing concludes that research in design cannot be ambiguous, but there are differential forms of answers that can be derived from this research design. Frayling has pointed out to the fact that for many professionals research is not the primary objective, but it is important in practice.
From analysis, it can be said that the strength of this research theme proposed by Frayling is the usage of conventional theme, referring to the rhetoric of research and development. And from this, the ability to provide holistic solutions and outcomes has been elucidated in great detail. The usage of appropriate examples for the same also elucidates with clarity the importance of research in designs and art.
Frayling has proposed three models of research design that they are researched into design. From this, he has been able to develop a broader overall scope involved in the research in design and art. However it was felt that there is a slight ambiguous definition provided by Frayling. It can be said that Frayling had never really construed the operational way in which the research must be framed and how they can reach the intended potential.
To conclude, Frayling had brought meaning for research into art and design notion. Prior to this, only the science was considered to have a systematic approach.