Assignment First

assignment代写:城市设计作为增加互动的工具

城市的日常生活是社会的象征,是人们固有文化的象征。在这个过程中,当城市以一种富裕阶层永远不会与贫困人群互动的方式被贬低时,人们似乎缺乏意识。人们根本不需要与那些没有基本设施的人打交道。这使得问题进一步深化。城市的设计师在忽略城市的一些区域的同时,在某些区域创造了成长的空间。这导致人民之间的分歧不断加深。城市发展与社区发展是不平等的。在城市的一端,城市人口似乎在增长,而内陆城市和低收入群体在很大程度上被遗忘了。这就导致了这样一种模式:忽视住在城市中心的人们的贫困和挣扎是没有问题的。

assignment代写:城市设计作为增加互动的工具

在技术同质化的过程中,文化符号化出现了退化。人们模仿竞争世界的做法,忘记了他们当地的象征和遗产。文化的损失更大。购物中心、办公室和公寓的设计让人们没有真正的互动需求。有一个精英群体和一个低收入群体,他们彼此之间没有互动。这种情况在过去的皇室家族中是存在的。然而,历史上的资产阶级在过去找到了与低收入群体交往的途径。这种情况在现代城市中已经发生了变化。精英阶层和富人阶层根本不想与低收入群体打交道。人民的民主和权力在这一经济隔离的进程中丧失了。

可以说,一个更好的设计也许不是所有社会弊病的灵丹妙药,但它肯定会为人们相互交往开辟新的途径。城市设计和社区设计师都面临着迎合顾客需求的问题。通过这一为所有成员创造平等空间的进程,将展开新的对话和互动。这可能是解决城市中其他问题的起点。社会中的人们可能会重新定位。

assignment代写:城市设计作为增加互动的工具

Routines of a city are a symbolization of the community and the innate culture of the people. In this process, when the city is deigned in a way where the affluent class will never interact with the people in poverty there seems to be a lack of awareness. The people simply do not have to interact with the people who do not have the basic facilities. This makes further deepening of the issues. The designers of the city create a space for growth in certain areas while ignoring some areas of the city. This has caused a deepening divide between the people. The urban development and the community development is not equal. It seems to be growing on one end of the cities while the inner cities and the lower income group are largely forgotten. This leads to the paradigm where it is simply fine to overlook the poverty and the struggles of people living in the inner cities.

assignment代写:城市设计作为增加互动的工具

There is degradation of the cultural symbolizations in the process of homogenization of the technology. The people emulate the practices of the competitive world and forget about their local symbolization and heritage. It gets greater loss of the culture. The shopping malls, office and the apartments are designed in a way that the people have no real need to interact with one another. There is an elite population and a low income group who do not interact with one another. This condition found to exists in the royal families in the past. Nevertheless, the bourgeois class in the historical times found ways to interact with the people in the lower income groups in the past. This has changed in the modern cities. The elites and the affluent class of the people simply do not want to interact with the lower income group. The democracy and the power of the people is lost in this process of economic segregation.
It can be argued that a better deign may not be a panacea for all the society evils, but it would certainly open new avenues for the people to interact with one another. The city design and the community designers face the issue of catering towards the needs of the customers. By this process of creating an equal space for all the members, new dialogues and interactions would open. This could be a starting point to cure the other issues that are stemming in the cities. There could be reorienting of the people in the societies.