代寫：GML收購MMM多數股權的事件問題分析
引發正在考慮的有關Dr Dawes、Mr. Foster、Mr. Huckenfusser和Mrs. Duck違反職責問題的主要事件是(2016年4月2日)董事會決定GML收購MMM多數股權的事件。為在本財政年度繼續進行該交易，準備了一份市場投標人聲明。這次會議的決定引發了一些問題，導致GML公司的董事和管理人員違反了職責。
問題1:福斯特先生導演在GML直到2016年4月30日意識到4月2日的決定,2016年會議重試和首席財務官的位置在QECG 5月5日,2016年在他的推薦購買嗯股票基於機密情報。6萬股股票以每股4.7美元的價格購得。機密信息是在GML會議上獲得的信息。2016年6月12日晚些時候，在再次召開的董事會上，決定不再繼續收購。盡管MMMs股價暴跌，QECG仍繼續持有其股票。根據第9條，福斯特先生是公司的董事。第9條規定，董事是任何被任命擔任該職位的人，並習慣於根據其職位所需的規則和義務行事。
代寫：GML收購MMM多數股權的事件問題分析
問題2:Dr Dawes是一名顧問董事，即使在破產後仍未被解職，並繼續領取顧問工資，建議他的妻子以自己的名義購買20000股MMM股票(每股5美元)。道斯博士沒有告訴她他從哪裏以及為什麽得到這些信息。這是他在GML的非公開董事會上收到的信息。會議結束後大約10分鐘，當她收到丈夫關於公司搬遷的指示時，她以12.70美元的價格賣出了MMM的股票。
問題3:出席董事會的GML音頻視覺技術人員Huckenfusser先生給了他的嫂子Duck stock tips，她在2016年5月15日以每股5.20美元的價格購買了5000股MMM股票。哈克福塞先生欠他嶽母5000英鎊的個人債務。在董事會決定不再繼續收購的12天前，鴨太太賣掉了自己的股份，實現了盈利。Huckenfusser先生是一名雇員。鴨太太既不是董事，也不是雇員，也不是軍官。
考慮到這三個問題，公司有可能違反了公司法，但是公司沒有采取任何行動
代寫：GML收購MMM多數股權的事件問題分析
The main event that triggered the issues under consideration with respect to breach of duties of Dr Dawes, Mr. Foster, Mr. Huckenfusser and Mrs. Duck is that of the board meeting (dated April 2, 2016) where the decision was taken for GML to acquire a majority shareholding in MMM. A market bidder statement was prepared for proceeding with the transaction in the financial year. Now a few issues were triggered by this meeting decision which resulted in breach of duty by directors and officers of the company GML.
Issue 1: Mr. Foster director in GML until April 30 2016 who was aware of the decision of the April 2, 2016 meetings retried and took up the position of Chief Financial Officer in QECG on 5 May, 2016 wherein he made the recommendation for purchase of MMM shares based on confidential intelligence. 60,000 shares were purchased at $4.70. The confidential information was the information acquired at the meeting in GML. Later in June 12, 2016, in a board meeting again, the decision to not continue the purchase was made. QECG continued to retain its shares, even as the MMMs share price collapsed. Mr. Foster is a director of the company according to Section 9 which states that the director is any person who is appointed to the position and is accustomed to act according to the rules and obligations as necessary for his position.
代寫：GML收購MMM多數股權的事件問題分析
Issue 2: Dr Dawes is a consultant director, who remained undischarged even after bankruptcy and continued to draw a consultant salary recommended to his wife to purchase 20,000 shares of MMM (at $5.00 per share) in her own name. Dr. Dawes did not tell her where or why he got the information. This is information he received at the private board meeting of GML. In about 10 minutes after the meeting ended, Mrs. Dawes sold her MMM shares at $12.70 when she received instructions from her husband on the company move.
Issues 3: Mr. Huckenfusser who is the Audio Visual Technician of GML who was present at the board meeting gave his sister in law, Mrs. Duck stock tips, on which recommendation she purchased 5,000 MMM shares for $5.20 per share on 15 May 2016. Mr. Huckenfusser owed his sister in law 5000 in personal debt. 12 days before the board meeting decision to not continue with the purchase was considered, Mrs. Duck had sold her shares and realized a profit. Mr. Huckenfusser is an employee. Mrs. Duck is neither Director, employee, nor officer.
Given these three issues now, there are possible breaches of the corporation law, but no actions have been taken by the company
