A key declaration of material culture system is that the objects have the aptitude to indicate certain statements, or institute social connotations, on behalf of people, as well as perform social functions through this culturally forthcoming capability should not be robotically implicit. Objects might signify sub-cultural affinity, occupation, participation in a leisure activity or social status. Additionally, objects befall integrated into, and symbolize, vast social conversations associated to exclusively detained norms and values preserved in social institutions. In harmonizing manner, material objects also tend to withhold individual a poignant significance, as it can ease interpersonal communications and support a person to act upon them. Consequently, material objects can also aid in structuring a adversative interpersonal and group attachments, arbitrating the pattern of self-identify and respect, as well as incorporating and discriminating social groups, classes or tribes. (Woodward, 2007)
The context of the object;
There are two central viewpoints on how objects obtain cultural significance and value contained by social contexts. Such perspectives lead towards imperative ways of exploring and studying material objects, and are classified as narratives and performances. (Woodward, 2007)
物质文化系统的一个重要声明，对象有能力一定的报表，或社会研究的内涵，代表人民，以及通过在即将到来的能力履行社会功能不应该自动隐式。对象可能意味着亚文化的亲和力，职业，一种休闲活动或社会地位参与。另外，对象发生整合，和象征，广阔的社会对话与专门关押的规范和在社会机构保留值。在协调的方式，材料的对象也往往会保留个人的意义，因为它可以缓解人际沟通和支持的人他们的行为。因此，材料的对象也可以帮助构建一个转折的人际关系和组织仲裁附件，模式识别，自我尊重，以及结合和歧视的社会群体，类或部落。（Woodward，2007）
对象的上下文；
有两种主要的观点对物体如何获得的文化意义和价值的社会环境中。这种观点导致的探索和研究对象的方法和必要的材料，分为叙事和表现。（Woodward，2007）
