加拿大士伯克大学论文代写：劳务合同
工作合同是定义在工作期间实行的界限，责任和规则的文件;如果有任何差异，它是有能力向特定当事方提供援助的基本文件。员工必须置于其雇主的指导，控制和指挥之下。这种情况是从事实情况（小时数，员工组织他们工作的自主程度，工作场所等）来评估的。
加拿大士伯克大学论文代写：劳务合同
有很多理论可以在这里或者在特定的情况下被纳入，比如负债理论;这些理论可以从原告的角度来行使，他的行为和行为通常是以往事件的产物。在负债理论如疏忽理论，严格的侵权责任等等的背后描述了很多概念。确切地说，属于产品错误描述的理论也可以扩展到服务，这个理论描述产品生产者和/或服务提供者对错误行为负责，这些行为不仅在当地也在国际层面上得到强调。但是，在所描述的情况下，上述理论不能作为整体使用，因为如上所述，在这种情况下，法院可能不会对Birchall的财务采取任何严肃行动，因为它不是正确履行法律义务，因为它是基本人力资源规定与已经完成的员工有详细的工作描述的合同;然而另一方面，卢克应该承担为什么他没有要求提供书面合同（关于新的一揽子计划）的责任，因为如果他有了所讨论公司的书面合同，他就不会面对这种类型的因为书面合同是保护文档以确保员工基本权利的一种类型，也是公司免受法律惩罚的最好方式。
加拿大士伯克大学论文代写：劳务合同
The work contract is the paper that defines the boundaries, responsibilities and rules that are practiced during the working periods; it is the essential doc that has the power to provide assistance to the particular parties in case of any discrepancy. The employee must be actually placed under the direction, control and command of his employer. This condition is assessed from the factual circumstances (subjection of hours, the employee’s degree of autonomy in organizing their work, workplace, etc.).
加拿大士伯克大学论文代写：劳务合同
There are lots of theories that could be incorporated here or in the given case scenario such as theories of Liabilities; these theories could be exercised in the perspective of plaintiff and his conducted action and his action is generally the product of previous events. There are lots of notion that are described under the hood of theories of Liabilities such as negligence theory, strict tort liability, etc. To be precise the theories that belong to the wrong depiction of the product and could be extended to services as well, this theory describe that producer of the product and/or provider of the services is liable for the wrong actions and these actions could be highlighted not only in local but also international level. However, in the described case, the above theories could not be used as whole because as described above as well that in this scenario, Court may not any serious action against the Birchall’s Finance to not practice the legal obligation properly because it is the basic HR rule to have proper contract with detailed Job description with the employee that is previously done, already; however, on the other side, Luke should be held responsible that why he didn’t ask to provide written contract (about the new package) because if he had the written contract from the discussed Corporation, he would haven’t face such type of difficulty because written contract is the type of protecting doc to ensure the basic right of the employee as well as it is also better for the corporation to protect from the legal penalties, etc.
