Assignment First

留学生代写:现代社会关联性的分析

当代社会是一个鲜活的呼吸、成长和壮大的动态整体。这是一项对比研究。毫无疑问,在世界各地,在特定的地理空间内,都存在着以经济为基础的不同阶级、不同的种姓、不同的肤色、不同的民族分布。因此,歧视的问题增加了许多倍,多样性也增加了许多倍,然而世界各地的社会继续在其特定结构内以各种相互作用的模式在社会内外发挥作用。许多与社会互动的网络在本质上与结构功能理论家对社会的概念化相似。然而,正是象征性的互动主义者控制着一个社会中所有显而易见的活动。即使在现代社会倾向于不可预测性的今天,这一理论仍然是有意义的。

同时代的社会动物或社会成员给予其天赋以自由支配,并允许自由意志的广泛表达。所有的男人和女人在各方面都被认为是平等的。世界各地实施的几项宪法修正案和立法规定,歧视任何形式的歧视都是强制性的。

The contemporary society is a living breathing, growing and expanding dynamic whole. It is a study in contrasts. There is no doubt several classes on the basis of economy, several castes, colors and ethnic distributions all over the world as well as within specific geographical spaces. Thus, the points of discrimination have multiplied many times over and so have the diversifications and yet societies all over the world continue to function within their given structures in various interactional patterns that extend within and outside the societies. Many of the networks of interaction with society are fundamentally similar to the structural-functional theorist’s conceptionalization of society. However, it is the symbolic interactionists who hold Sway over all the proceedings apparent within a society. The theory is relevant even today seeing the modern society’s proclivity towards unpredictability.
The contemporaneous social animal or member of society gives free reign to his or her genius and allows for the extensive expression of free will. All men and women are considered equal in every way. Several constitutional amendments and legislations brought into action all over the world have made it mandatory for discriminating against any form of discrimination.

留学生代写:现代社会关联性的分析

尽管各国政府承诺,所有个人都将按照自己的天赋成长,但社会冲突理论几乎没有理由具有相关性。然而,人们发现冲突继续存在。在人类居住的所有形式中,他们仍然是“有者”和“无者”的群体。无论研究哪个经济部门,社会差异都是显而易见的。无论是服务业、重工业和技术业,还是简单的制造业和销售业,到处都有处于不同阶梯阶段的人。底层的人羡慕上层的人。因此,社会冲突理论同样适用。然而,应该以一种更加灵活和动态的方式来考虑这个问题。

因此,从一开始,这两种理论都不能单独描述同时代社会的基本原则。然而,当他们结合在一起,他们可以应用到今天的社会在某些方面。而毫无疑问,当今社会是免费的,开放,透明和尊重个人的选择,在很大程度上,有一个潜在的螺纹表面时不时的歧视态度,尽管没有任何形式的冲突恶化的原因在任何的地方通常是发现这些天。它的增长还有其他一些原因。这可能是因为当时政府的政治意愿,将社会存在的这些部分保持在这个水平,以获得相对于其他政治实体的优势。因此,冗长的承诺和部分提供利益变成了周围冲突的长期存在。

当今社会的许多社会政治进程都可以用这两种理论来解释。然而,这还不是全部。社会学思想的发展已经远远超出了单一理论的局限和范围,这一事实表明,对社会进行整体研究的空间是巨大的。

While governments have promised the growth of all individuals according to their own genius, there is little reason for the relevance of the theory of social conflict. However, it has been found that conflicts continue to exist. They continue to be the groupings of the ‘haves’ and the ‘have not’ in all forms of humans settlements. No matter which sector of economy is looked at the societal differentials are visible. Whether it is the services sector, the heavy industrial and technological sector or the simple manufacturing and sales sector, everywhere there are people who are at various stages of the ladder. Those at the bottom envy those at the top. Thus, the theory of social conflict holds equally true. It is, however, to be considered in a more fluid and dynamic manner.
Thus, at the outset, both theories singly cannot be said to describe the basic tenets of contemporaneous society. However, when taken together, they can apply to the society of today in some aspects. While there is no doubt that society today is free, open, and transparent and honors individual choices, to a large extent, there is an underlying thread of discriminatory attitudes that surface every now and then, while there are no reasons for conflict of any form of fester in any of the locations where it is most often found these days. There are some other reasons for its growth. This is probably because of the political will of the government of the day to keep these parts of social existence at this level to gain an edge over other political entities. Thus, the rigmarole of promise and partial delivery of benefits turns into a perpetuation of conflict all around.
Many of the current socio-political processes in society can be explained on the basis of these two theories. Yet, it is not the complete picture. The fact that sociological thought has expanded far beyond the limitations and purview of one single theory shows that there is ample scope for presenting a wholistic study of society.