数学论文：柯林斯将想法转化为研究评论
在这一章中，柯林斯提供了一个整体的方法来规划创意和创新。他解释了思维过程的细微差别，并对如何呈现这些细微差别形成了自己的见解。
为了产生和提炼研究思路，重要的是形成源于联系的思路。为此，作者使用了许多有趣的例子。为了创造创新的理念，有一个系统的过程已经阐明。运用运动阶梯法、随机单词法和思维导图法进行头脑风暴是作者所阐述的不同的程序技术。一旦想法形成，他们需要映射到不同的来源爱德华德博诺六顶思考帽是一个有趣的连接想法的方式。四个学习目标，如实质技能，过程技能，方法技能和自我认识是一些技术。在此基础上，作者提出了漏斗法。
柯林斯为研究思路的形成提供了一种程序化、系统化的方法。有效地阐明了整理和整理思想的具体方法。思维导图和Debono概念的结合是进行研究的有效途径。漏斗法解释了跟踪思想和形成战略理论的方法，以有效地安排数据。一般来说，把创新和创造力放在一个语境中是非常困难的。在创新思维的过程中，很难对创新思维的过程进行形式化的描述和形式化的描述。作者从这个固有的弱点开始，但有效地提供了工具。柯林斯的《世界》阐明了它们在系统研究中是如何有用的，并就如何整理和呈现它们提供了见解。
总而言之，柯林斯一开始就面临着一项与生俱来的艰巨任务，那就是为创造力创造一个过程。这本身就是一项艰巨的任务，并有效地提供了显示信息的工具。
数学论文：柯林斯将想法转化为研究评论
In this chapter, Collins has provided with a holistic approach of strategizing creative ideas and innovation. He has explained the nuances of the thought process and has developed insights as to how they can be presented.
To generate and refine research ideas, it is important to form ideas that stems from connections. For this, the author has used a lot of interesting examples. In order to create ideas for innovation, there is a systematic process that has been elucidated. Brainstorming using of the movement ladder, random word techniques and mind maps are the different procedural techniques that have been elucidated by the author.Once the idea is formed they need to be mapped to the different sources Edward De bono six thinking hats are an interesting way of connecting Ideas. Four learning objectives such as substantive, processual skills, methodological skills and self-knowledge are some of the techniques. From this, the author has suggested a funnel approach.
Collins has provided a procedural systemic method to develop research ideas. Substantiative methods of collating and arranging the ideas have been effectively elucidated. Mind map and combining of Debono concept are effective ways of conducting research. Funnel down approach explains the method of tracking down ideas and forming strategic theories to arrange data effectively. In general, it is very difficult to contextualize innovation and creativity. It is very difficult to map down and bring procedure for innovative thinker during the creative process. The author has started out with this inherent weakness but has effectively given the tools. The world by Collins elucidates how they are useful in systematic research and also provides insights as to how they should be collated and presented.
To conclude, Collins has started with an inherent arduous task of bringing a procedure for creativity. This in itself is a hard task and has effectively provided the tools to present the information.
