英国施工论文代写：BIM调查报告
这项调查有两个关键目标。最初的目标是审查在美国，英国，澳大利亚等地建立BIM的建筑公司的百分比。第二个目标是找到有利于正在应用BIM方法的公司。此外，对于没有应用这种设计方法的公司，实施这项服务的障碍也可以通过问卷调查来评估。主要国家被强调审查英国和美国。美国也许是扩大BIM技术的头号。尽管英国很多公司都在长期分析BIM。只有少数公司正在安排实施这种设计方法。此外，鼓励在BIM开展学习的学者完成调查。
调查结果
问卷调查表明，BIM的施工时间下降是最显着的改善。被认为是BIM工具的最大客户的美国的结果甚至反映了相同的情况。美国只有25％的公司声称他们正在实施BIM来建造和控制其建设项目。这一结果甚至表明，尽量减少施工时间是实施BIM最重要的优势之一。或者，大多数不适用BIM的公司认为BIM指导会给公司花费大量的时间和人力。这是使用BIM设计工具的主要障碍（Wix，J. 1997）。因此，BIM指导的人力和时间成本是其功能的主要障碍。
调查问卷以数字形式交付给约一百名施工从业人员和学者。这些是从私人接触中任意选择的。答复率约为75％。许多答复都是不合逻辑的答案，因此被忽视。因此，收集了63份有效答复，22份来自美国，19份来自英国，22份来自其他国家。结果表明，BIM作为3D设计应用尚未完全被批准。 30名受访者声称他们对BIM的主题很少认识。 26位受访者表示不知道BIM工具。声称对BIM了解足够的受访者总数只有13位。总体而言，这个设计技术中没有人是专业人士。
英国施工论文代写：BIM调查报告
There are two key goals of this survey. The initial goal is to review the percentage of construction firms implementing BIM in the US, UK, Australia and others. The second goal is to locate the advantageous to the firms who are applying BIM methodology. Moreover, for the firms who haven’t applied this design approach, what are the obstacles to implement this service can also be evaluated through questionnaire. Major countries were emphasized on to review, UK and USA. The United States is perhaps the head in expansion of BIM technology. Although, a great deal of firms in the UK have been analysing BIM for a long period. Just a few firms are scheduling to implement this design methodology. Moreover, academics that carry out study in BIM were encouraged to complete the survey.
Questionnaire outcomes
Questionnaires reveal that BIM’s decline of construction timeframe is the most significant improvement. The outcome from the United States which was considered to be the maximum client of BIM tool even reflects the same circumstances. Just 25% firms in the USA claim that they’re implementing BIM to construct and control their construction projects. This outcome even reveals that to minimize the construction timeframe is the one of the most important advantage of implementing BIM. Alternatively, majority of the firms who don’t apply BIM think that BIM guidance would cost their firms a lot of time and manpower. This is the major obstacle to use BIM design tool (Wix, J. 1997). Therefore, the manpower and time cost of BIM guidance is the main obstruction to their functioning.
The questionnaire was delivered in digital form to about 100 construction practitioners and academics. Those were arbitrarily selected from private contacts. The reply rate was approximately 75%. Many replies comprised illogical answers and were consequently overlooked. Hence, 63 valid replies were collected, 22 from the USA, 19 from the UK and 22 from other nations. The outcomes reveal that BIM as a 3D design application hasn’t been entirely approved yet. 30 respondents claimed that they recognize very little on the subject of BIM. 26 respondents stated that they are not aware of BIM tool. The total number of respondents who claim that they understand enough about BIM was just 13. Nobody in total was located to be a professional in this design technology.
